🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an global treaty created to safeguard women from violence, covering family violence, following prolonged and heated debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The final decision now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in Latvia last year, mandating governments to establish legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to begin the process of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a decision that rights groups characterized as a significant setback for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative factions have contended that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a move proposed by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the main parties supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent decision has sparked widespread outcry both within Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has called a demonstration for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Potential Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision driven by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying regression for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds support, the head of state could potentially return the bill for further consideration if he holds concerns.

President the national leader stated on social media that he would assess the decision according to constitutional requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across Europe," stated a human rights activist.

• Family violence rates have been increasing in several European nations
• The European treaty mandates specific legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could affect comparable debates in additional EU countries