🔗 Share this article Progressive Governments Could Unite to Announce an Crisis. This is How. Trump's political theatre often seems to transform even opposition into part of the performance. We become similar to supporting actors who splutter while he thrills his followers by disregarding long-standing principles. However what if we produced our own symbolic action omitting the former president aside – or alternatively with a distinct focus? Earlier Examples of Political Resistance Americans during the pre-Revolution era developed innovative types of protest against British crackdown. Rather than relying on existing governmental institutions, they chose non-importation committees and even a first continental congress without any apparent authorization or precedent. Those measures of public demonstration, however weak, ultimately resulted in national sovereignty. After the war, framers held a delegates' meeting – officially for revising the initial governing document with consensus from all states. Instead, the framers operated privately, substituted the document entirely, and modified the method for modifying the updated system to a three quarters vote. A Modern Possibility for Transformation The previous administration constitutes a colossal regression to democratic principles, however it offers an opportunity to improve such principles constructively. Like the framers, we could create a selective, exclusive assembly – a preliminary framework development – that resisting Democratic states specifically create independently, limit among themselves, and direct. The U.S. Constitution already provides certain provisions for such action. Proposing an Regional Agreement The selected regions might assemble to develop a multi-state partnership by and between themselves, following the concept though not necessarily the precise language of such agreements that the constitution’s interstate agreement clause describes. They would present officially to national representatives for approval as binding policy. Obviously approval seems unlikely in this case, since the legislature in its present gridlocked state is incapable of anything like a new constitution, embryonic or not. But the objective is to propose a model for a different approach of political organization, in a future political landscape, that carries forward elements of the existing institutional framework that is worth preserving, alongside substantial transformation in response to the previous administration. A Practical Example Consider this: Several progressive states might announce a national emergency. Regional leaders would invite several aligned anti-Trump states to send representatives elected via popular vote or state representatives. Their responsibility would be to draw up a regional agreement, a declaration of entitlements of citizens and obligations of involved regions. The compact would divide financial support of those obligations between the states and national authorities, if it were eventually approved at the federal level. It would create mandates that national authorities would support financially – just for member governments and any other that subsequently decide to join the partnership. An Inspirational Opening The partnership might begin with an introduction in which The residents of participating regions acknowledge not just our entitlements but our obligations to treat all members with dignity. The introduction would recognize our responsibilities to guarantee all have food security, retirement benefits, medical care availability, productive jobs as security in an age of AI advancement. It should be explicit concerning the threats of AI and climate change. It should require on national responsibility in scientific advancement and research-informed healthcare policy to guarantee we live better with extended healthspans. Addressing Past Abuses Additionally the agreement must contain a specific list of abuses during the last presidency, harmful policies, that should be addressed and remedied, and abuses by federal courts, for example Citizens United, that ought to be voided through state action ratifying the compact. Initially, the states must incorporate Washington D.C. and the territory to join as states on the same footing and participate the partnership. The Hardest Component – Money Following is the biggest challenge – money. The partnership would specify the specific programs which regional governments ought to support and initiatives that Washington must finance – basically for participating regions that ratify the compact. The compact would function as a structural document for the ages, but a budget document for short-term action. It must contain a restoration of financial support for healthcare programs, and decreasing of payments for other forms medical care. A Welcoming Opportunity Lastly, this agreement should include an invitation to conservative states, and every other non-signatory government to join also, although they hadn't been initially included. Symbolic Consequences Regardless of what may be said opposing such an agreement, it might shift the former president from center stage and demonstrate a specific tradition-defying courage from progressive forces. It might offer progressive regions acknowledgment for autonomous little smashing of traditions. Even better should additional regions choose not to join. {In